Category Archives: American Culture

On David Whitley, Colin Kaepernick and unprofessional levels of critical thought

Identifying oneself as a sports writer requires a certain degree of self-loathing, mostly because it forces you to label yourself in the same category as people who accept salaries from major media companies and then spend their time polluting the public sphere with the same type of toxic brain-shit that is already produced for free in mass quantities across the Internet. In short, the David Whitleys of the world make all sports writers look bad. People look at you and automatically assume that you are an out-of-touch white guy who gets paid to pander to one of the most vulnerable segments of our population — sports fans trying to kill time at work. Which is to say that they treat you the same way Whitley treats Colin Kaepernick in his latest manifesto for the Sporting News, cutting to the core of Jim Harbaugh’s controversial decision to start the second-year quarterback over veteran Alex Smith by focusing on the crucial issue of Kaepernick’s arm tattoos.

Whitley writes that the new 49ers starter “must make the guys in San Quentin happy,” because, after all, “approximately 98.7 percent of the inmates at California’s state prison have tattoos.” He then proceeds to chide Kaepernick for his ink, pointing out that most quarterbacks do not have tattoos because “NFL quarterback is the ultimate position of influence and responsibility. He is the CEO of a high-profile organization, and you don’t want your CEO to look like he just got paroled.”

Rather than argue against Whitley’s point — because, let’s be honest, he really does not have one — it is more constructive to look it as a primer on everything that is wrong with lowest-common-denominator commentary.  Continue reading

On Steve Jobs, Tom Junod and the novelty of truth

Eggs and crabcakes and bacon on toast — that was my breakfast this morning. But also, the October issue of Esquire, and its brief postmortem on Steve Jobs, which features esteemed writer Tom Junod’s quest to determine why, exactly, American society professes to miss Apple’s former CEO so dearly. The quest focuses on a pair of conversations with John Lasseter and Ed Catmull, the team in charge of Pixar, the animation studio that Jobs helped transform into an entertainment powerhouse. While Lasseter lauds his former boss’ unwavering commitment to pouring his personal fortune into a venture that spent nine years in the red, Catmull explains the significance of Jobs’ absence in more abstract terms.

“He served a really important role,” Catmull tells Junod. “As we made our films, he was the guys who told the truth.”

Jobs, it has been noted, was not a person who catered to the insecurities of his coworkers. His eye for intuitive products was matched only by his propensity toward assholery, a characteristic Junod notes in his retrospective. But he told the truth.

“And,” Junod writes, “That’s what blew people away — that’s why when we mourned Steve Jobs we couldn’t help but mourn ourselves. He was willing to be honest. He told the truth to people entirely unaccustomed to hearing it, and because he also knew how to both coddle and terrify them, they greeted his pronouncements as emanations from an oracle.”

It is a fascinating conclusion, mostly because of the indictment it serves on the psychology of our race. Any honest examination of human society must result in the conclusion that we are a species entirely uncomfortable with the reality of our existence. Is the material world that we have created anything more than a buffer of cognitive ease designed to block out the realities that are far more difficult to process? Within the issue of Esquire that relays Junod’s message about Jobs, we find other messages that assure us that a pair of tailored Levis can help us be young and hungry and go forth, that a Seiko watch can move us step closer toward the attainment of perfection, and that membership in the World Wildlife Federation can fulfill our desire  to “be the voice for those who have no voice,” a constituency that in this case includes a handsome tiger who, we can only assume, will find some nonverbal way to thank us should we meet one day in the wild. Continue reading

Ah, Philadelphia before the decline of industrial America

If I had the means, I would use promises of campaign contributions to lure every politician in America to a conference room in Center City. Then I’d lock the door and refuse to release them until they figured out a way to get America back to the place that is portrayed in the following video clip that first aired in 1955.

Some highlights….

“Bethlehem, where every Christmas a huge star glows from the hilltop, where every other night in the year the sky is lit with the hungry furnaces of little steel, coal from Pennsylvania mines to feed to monsters who never grow cold, and then, steel, in myriad forms, for many purposes, steel, the backbone and shield of our way of life.”

“The world’s largest, fresh-water port. Here, a cargo ship arrives or departs every 30 minutes of every day and every night. This port, with its magnificent facilities, has played the largest single part of bringing our miracle to pass. For this, is the magnet, a safe harbor, free from storms and free from strife, with less man hours lost to labor disputes than any other port in the country.”

“Unlike many other large ports, this is no hot-bed of violence and corruption. The tradition here is one of peaceful mediation, of steady employment. We have kept our waterfront clean. Only for the racketeers is their very litte work.”

“This unceasing activity on Dock st is a constant reminder to us that the waters of the Delaware surging down to the sea, this is our very lifeblood.”

Cool vintage shots:

4:50 – Shot of the Inquirer/Daily News building.

5:35 Franklin Field. I’m pretty certain this is a shot of a 1953 game between Penn and Ohio State, which was then ranked No. 17 in the AP Poll. The shot is of quarterback Dave Leggett (No. 22) getting tackled by a Penn defender. Ohio State won 12-6 in front of 44,270.

5:54 – This appears to be a clip of Red Sox outfielder Jim Piersall doubling off of A’s pitcher Bobby Shantz on Opening Day at Connie Mack Stadium in 1954. There were 16,331 people in attendance to watch Eddie Joost’s A’s win 6-4.

6:32 – Vintage Mummers. Wild, weird, but, above all, wonderful!

8:00 – For things alone will not make a city great, nor give a people a feeling of loyalty and confidence, a sense of belonging to a healthy community. This is accomplished largely by ideas, flashing in the night of complacency and ignorance.

8:30 – Antennas!

According to Phil Taylor, the child molesters have won

Phil Taylor has a piece in this week's Sports Illustrated that is equal parts thought-provoking and sad. In a column titled "The Sandusky Effect," Taylor describes how the recent child molestation accusations against former college coaches Jerry Sandusky and Bernie Fine have made him re-consider the way he handles his duties as the head junior varsity basketball coach at Summit Prep in Redwood City, Calif. Taylor writes that, every now and then, a player will ask him for a ride home from practice. 

I have always said yes, not just because I don't want them walking home in the dark, but also because the one-on-one conversations in teh car make going a little out of my way more than worthwhile. Sitting in the passenger seat, boys talk to me about the pros and cons of attending school dances, or give 10-minute tutorials on hip-hop, or tell me what they're looking for in a college. But there won't be any more of those chats, at least not in my car, because I don't drive kids home anymore. Not since Sandusky.

Taylor proceeds to explain other ways in which the allegations against Sandusky and Fine have altered his actions as a coach. He says he always leaves the gym door open when he is working one-on-one with a player. He says he even thinks about the proper amount of physical contact to use when congratulating a player returning to the bench during a game.

My gut reaction is that a society in which male role models no longer feel at ease doing the things that male role models do — like, for instance, giving them rides home and talking to them about their teen-aged angst — is a society that is in serious trouble. At the same time, I played basketball through the junior varsity level and not once got a ride home from one of my coaches.

I haven't thought this through enough to say that Taylor is over-reacting. But I do think that his hesitations are more a function of the media-saturated world we live in than it is a function of the actions of a small handful of creeps. I don't think child molestation is any more common now than it was 50 years ago. I do think that we hear more about it. It'd be a shame if these recent high-profile events prompt honest coaches to avoid close relationships with their players, some of whom may not have any other option when it comes to a strong male influence. At the same time, I can't say for sure how I would feel if I were a coach. Because I'm not a coach. I'm a writer. And, while we're on the topic, some day I would like to have a writing job that allows me the time to coach a junior varsity basketball team. 

Anyway, the Taylor's column is only available to SI subscribers. But if you get a chance to read it, let me know what you think. 

Christmas in America, 2011

Joe was halfway out the dealership door before I had even yanked the emergency brake on my car. His quick first-step was rewarded. As far as I could tell, I was the first one on the lot. It was five minutes past 9 o'clock on a chilly Christmas Eve morning. For once in my life I had done the sensible thing, leaving my parents house in upper Bucks county under the cover of darkness, determined to arrive at the mall the moment the doors opened so I could finish my shopping before the inevitable onslaught of fellow procrastinators choked the parking lots and checkout aisles. Really, it was not much of a chore. I do not sleep well when I am at home, mostly because my feet hang off the edge of the twin bed to which I am relegated whenever I spend the night at the empty nest. The night is spent tossing and turning, which is not all that unusual except that the twin bed in question rests on a wheeled bed frame, which rests on a hard wood floor, which means I spend more time piloting the bed back to its original position than I do in REM sleep. Sometimes, I give up and move to the couch, which does not have many ergonomic advantages aside from the fact that it is anchored to the ground. Sometimes, I give up and hop in my car and drive back to my king-sized bed in Philadelphia, the two-hour round trip well worth the five or six hours of actual sleep it enables me to steal before the next day's festivities. 

Christmas is an interesting experience when you are three houses removed from the one in which you grew up. I envy my friends who each December pack up their cars and head back to the homes where they were raised. Their feet might hang over their beds, but their beds are actually theirs, not some leftover twin shoved into a home office two hours from where they were raised. I imagine this contributes to a more restful night of sleep. 

This year, I gave up on sleep around 3 a.m., climbing into my car in the cold suburban night and heading to Wawa for a cup of coffee and a Gatorade. Upon returning, I sat down at my laptop and put together a gameplan: Best Buy at 7 a.m., the Montgomeryville Mall a half hour later, and finally a stop by a car dealership in Conshohocken where I had hopes of finally trading in the canary yellow piece of crap I had been driving since I was 23. 

By the time I slammed my car door shut, Joe was ambling to meet me halfway, his right hand extended as a colleague who had been wandering the lot approached from behind a few seconds to late. The colleague, an older gentleman with gray hair and a ruddy complexion, cast a spiteful smile that I caught out of the corner of my eye as I introduced myself to Joe. 

"What's so funny?" I asked the colleague, who shook his head and let us be.

Joe brushed it off.

"I don't know," Joe said, motioning with his head to the departing colleague. "Everyone thinks he's a little crazy, anyway."

Joe has the look of a guy who has been in the car business a little too long, the creases on his worn face like fault lines meandering through the desert crust. I told Joe what I was looking for and he pointed me in the right direction. Less than a hour later, we were sitting at his cramped work station inside the dealership boucning numbers back and forth. Joe could tell I already knew a fair price for the car, and he obliged me with a quote that slightly surpassed my expectations.

"It's not like it used to be," he said later. "Back then, even the accountants couldn't figure out the actual price of a car. It was like a murder mystery trying to figure it out. Now, with the Internet, everybody knows."

Months of research and discussions with various dealerships had re-inforced what I had already assumed: It's a good time to buy a car. Hell, it's a good time to buy anything, provided you can afford to do so. When I bought the canary car, the housing bubble was still swelling and credit was still available who anybody who could spell their name correctly on an application. The world was full of young dip-shits like myself with non-existent credit profiles and no idea just how difficult things were about to get for the American economy. I forget the exact rate at which I financed the Canary, but on the range of percentage points it was much closer to Credit Card than Year-end Dealer Incentive.

As I mentioned before, Joe looked to have been in the car business long enough to have seen the years of plenty, and appearances were not deceiving. As the finance people were drawing up the paperwork, we sat at his desk and talked about his various stops along the way.

"You should have seen it on Sept. 11th," he said. "I sold a car to a lady early that morning and then we watched on TV. She was the last person in the dealership for two weeks."

"Two weeks?" I said.

"Two weeks," he said.

"Nobody even came into the store?"

"Not a single person. For two weeks. It was like the entire nation was in shock. Nobody knew what was going to happen, whether we were going to go to war, whether we were going to get hit again, what was in store. Everybody just shut down."

The ground floor of the economy is a fascinating thing. The first people who realize things are headed south are the ones who are in charge of moving inventory. Things rebounded for a short time, but Joe had to know that dark days were coming, that far too much credit was going out to far too many people who lived their lives on the edge of ends meet. None of us knew the extent of what it all meant, of the precarious nature of political capital gained via fear. Two unfunded wars, stimulus checks, tax breaks, the big-picture ramifications did not matter to any of us, because deep down inside all of us were unsure whether there would even end up being a big picture. For the first time in a lot of our lives, our concern for our individual safety overshadowed any of the potential consequences of our country's actions. A good day was any day that did not end with hundreds of our countrymen leaping to their deaths out of burning high rises. Our entire national pathos had shifted to a sort of fatalistic optimism. Hell, as long as we aren't getting hit again, it can't be all bad, can it?

Self-preservation is a powerful instinct, and you cannot convince me that it did not play a role in the economic tumult that would eventually sweep our country. The world landscape was changing so quickly that few of us saw any sense in considering the long-term ramifications of our actions. And so we borrowed, and we lent, and we looked for the quick buck at the risk of leaving our asses exposed.

"I tell you man, there is one guy I'm glad they got," Joe said. "It took awhile. But when they finally got him, I was so happy. I remember that day, watching baseball, the crowd chanting."

Joe and I sat at his desk, staring at the clutter of papers spread out in front of us, nodding in silence. The night they finally got him, there was some hand-wringing about the spontaneous outbursts of glee that occurred around the nation. Blood-lust, some people said. But that wasn't it. At least I hope it wasn't. I hope that the majority of the country felt like Joe and I felt, like we were finally becoming American again, a country that achieves the missions it embarks upon, regardless of the toll that it takes. That night, a lot of us realized that it had been nearly a decade since we had felt some sense of normalcy, some sense of life as it was before the planes hit the towers and the shit hit the fan. For at least one night, that normalcy had returned. After 10 years, we were free to release the emotion and angst that had built inside of our psyches as we waited and waited and waited for some concrete foot to fall, as we yearned for this War on Abstraction to yield some sort of tangible result.

More than any other Christmas we have experienced over the past decade, we are able to sit back and reflect on where our society, American society, needs to head in the coming years. Osama bin Laden is dead. One of our two unfunded wars is over, the vast majority of troops having returned home to spend the holiday season with their families and friends and countrymen. The question, now, is what happens next?

A week from now, the new year will arrive and the trees and lights and candles will be packed away, and we will hopefully turn our attention back toward a societal progression that in many ways has felt on hold for the previous decade. Unfortunately, the sense of unity and the hope for a new beginning did not last long after that May night when a definitive fight against terror was actually won. As we sit with our families today and contemplate all that is good about our lives, my hope is that we can all spend some time reflecting on what all of us need to do to improve a society that continues to fracture. The Dow has risen steadily since Christmas of '08, from 9,000 to 10,000 to 11,000 to just over 12,000, which is good news for the small minority that benefits most from such improvements. But unemployment remains around 9 percent, its trend downward lagging far behind the soaring profitability of the corporations who supposedly create the jobs for the rest of us.

If we all pay some serious thought and prayer to our current situation, I think we will realize that our country has always thrived when the majority of us play an integral role in its profitability. We are the United States of America, and we are at our best when we are United. Instead of dwelling on the ideologies and policies where we disagree, our focus needs to turn to the common ground that all of us share. What good is individual profit if it leads to a society that is so stratified it can no longer stand? If you believe in prayer, pray for our leaders, pray that they might realize that the penthouse can only stand because of the foundation on which it rests. If you believe in action, act in a way that inspires the type of ephiphany that all of us need to experience: that we benefit when our neighbor benefits, even if his benefit lessens our benefit. Lincoln warned us of the end-result of a house that is divided. Donne warned us of the perils of turning ourselves into islands. 

Decades from now, when the winners sit down to write their histories of this pivotal time in our nation's history, I believe that they will look at Sept. 12, 2001 to Dec. 31, 2011 as the Decade of Uncertainty. I hope that the next 10 years will prove to be the Decade of New Optimism. We cannot afford another decade like the one whose tail lights are disappearing into the Iraqi dust. Pray, hope, act so that the uniters will prevail. Five years from now, I will own the Optima that now sits in my driveway. I hope the vast majority of us will be able to say the same. 

Richard Russo, Stephen King, Scott Turow and the cost of Community

"I do think it’s worthwhile explaining to customers that the lowest price point does not always represent the best deal. If you like going to a bookstore then it’s up to you to support it. If you like seeing the people in your community employed, if you think your city needs a tax base, if you want to buy books from a person who reads, don’t use Amazon.”
 
Tom agreed: “People have to understand that their short-term decision to save a couple bucks undermines their long-term interest in their community and vital, real-life literary culture.”
Few of us have the ability to start an e-mail chain that includes best-selling authors like Dennis Lehane, Scott Turow and Stephen King. Then again, few of us are Richard Russo, who has the distinction of being the only novelist in America to both win the Pulitzer Prize (Empire Falls) and co-write a Twilight movie that failed to gross more than $16 million at the box office (shoulda made Gene Hackman a vampire). So while you and I forward Nigerian investment schemes and sleeping kitty pictures to our friends and fellow office-dwellers, Russo talks books with his novel-writing A-Team. One recent email chain became fodder for an editorial in today's New York Times, where Russo examines Amazon.com's latest marketing ploy, which encourages customers to visit brick-and-mortar bookstores with its new "price-check" app, a smart phone program that enables readers to scan various products and then see how much they would save by purchasing said product on Amazon.com.
 
It's a worthy read, for a variety of reasons. First and foremost, the writers unanimously denounce Amazon's marketing campaign, despite the fact that Amazon has made most of them a lot of money. Turow even suggest there might be grounds for a legal challenge (at the very least, there are grounds for a novel about a legal challenge). But this isn't about the letter of the law. Rather, it is about the simmering conflict between capitalism and community, and the increasingly negative effects that multi-national corporations like Amazon are having on the fabric of American life. This, right here, is the economy. This is why median household income and middle class wages stagnated during the first decade of the new millenium. This is why state and local governments are spiraling toward insolvency. This, right here, is it. Economists can make numbers say anything, which is why the miserable science has become almost as politicized as politics itself. But all we really need to do is look at what is going on in front of us.
 
The quote at the top of this post is from novelist Ann Patchett, who recently opened her own independent bookstore in Nashville after a number of other shops closed, and she is dead on. On the surface, companies like Amazon are beneficial for consumers. Why pay $20 for a hardcover from a local bookstore when you can pay $15 for the same product from Amazon? On the surface, the $5 that you save is $5 that can be spent on other goods or services. But that is only the surface. The thing many of us ignore is the deeper impact of our purchasing decisions. When you pay $20 for a hardcover from a local bookstore, that money goes into the local economy. It helps pay the wages of local workers, which helps fund the operations of local government, which helps fund essential local services. When you pay $15 for a hardcover from Amazon, where does that $15 go? 
 
When we purchase goods and services from local retailers, we not only are enhancing our own lives, we are enhancing the life of our community. The biggest flaw of the Occupy movement is its decision to assign culpability to corporations instead of the individuals who decide to patronize those corporations. We do not need to Occupy City Hall. We need to Occupy local bookstores, and we need to Occupy them with our money. What good is purchasing power if we are forced to utilize our purchases in isolation, our purchasing decisions having eroded Community to the point where towns and cities are no longer marketplaces of commerce and human interaction but sprawls of houses filled with goods created by distant people and distributed by distant corporations who are so far removed from our lives that they can focus on maximizing profits without having to worry about social conscience?
 
While a company like Amazon might enhance our short-term purchasing power, it is fair to wonder whether it costs us in the long-term. If all of us save $5 on a book while at the same time diminishing local jobs and depressing local wages and eroding local tax bases, have we really succeeded in purchasing more happiness? Or will we end up purchasing ourselves to a point where we no longer have the option of patronizing local businesses, our disposable income having fallen to a point where we no longer have the option of patronizing businesses that do not offer us the best short-term material value for our dollar?  

Study: Voters fleeing major parties

Source: ThirdWay.org

Some interesting numbers were released today by the centrist think tank Third Way: the number of voters leaving the Republican and Democratic parties has increased in eight key battleground states, including Pennsylvania. The report, which uses data from the Secretaries of State, found that the number of registered Independents has risen by 3.4 percent since the 2008 elections. The number of registered Democrats has fallen by 5.4 percent, while the number of registered Republicans has falledn by 3.1 percent. Third Way predicts that the 2012 election will see more Independents at the polls since the Ford/Carter election in 1976.

From my point of view, the numbers are encouraging. More people are realizing that neither major party offers the types of solutions necessary to reverse the declining educational and economic standards we have witnessed over the last decade-plus. As we wrote in an earlier post, the hope as that these disenchanted voters will find a way to set aside their secondary differences and coalesce into a voting bloc that wields signifcant power to change the fundamental problem with our system: the influence that campaign contributions exert on the decisions made by our policy makers.

Of course, the data is not all positive, particularly when you look at states like Pennsylvania and New Hampshire, where Independent registration has fallen along with registration in the two major parties. The last thing this country needs is for disaffected voters to completely abandon the system, which only serves to concentrate the power in the existing structure.

Joe Paterno, Rick Perry, truck-flipping, my generation, and the values for which we fight

“Rather than love, than money, than fame, give me truth.” — Henry David Thoreau
“It’s unfortunate. We preach, preach, preach and they stepped out of line. They deserve what they’re going to get. Whatever that’s going to be, I don’t know. My feeling on all of this is they have a responsibility to the      program, they have a responsibility to themselves, to their family. They have responsibility to their teammates. And if they do something as dumb as it appears they did, and I’m not saying if they did or they didn’t yet, but even being close to that kind of thing, I’m not going to play any one of those three kids this weekend.” — Joe Paterno

I think we can tell a lot about a society by its riots, by the values it holds dear enough to rise up and protect in the face of withering persecution. Civil disorder is wrought by those who feel excluded from the civility that has been imposed by the ruling class, so its machinations tend to reveal the true nature of both the powerful and the oppressed. The spark to the powder keg occurs with a single act of injustice, and like a shrieking teapot, the tempest explodes.

I thought about this last night as hundreds of students flooded the main drag at Penn State and revealed their definition of injustice. And it made me sad. It made me sad for our generation. It made me sad for our country. But most of all, it made me sad for our future. Because it made me think that we have reached a point in our culture where we can no longer rely on our young and most open-minded members to act as the driving forces behind positive social change.

You might think this is an over-reaction, and you might be correct. This web site is not going to be another one of those places where somebody sits in front of a computer screen and interprets reality in definitive terms and leaves you to either agree with him or tell him to go bleep himself. It is not going to fit the current prototype of a blog, where people of a similar mindset can congregate in intellectual safety and feed upon information and opinion that caters to their established world view. One of the things I have come to believe is that the most consistently-honest declaration in the English language is, “I don’t know.” For some reason, admitting the lack of knowledge is much harder than pretending that we have it. We live in a country where knowledge is often defined as a talking point. Find enough people who share the same mindset, and that mindset becomes Truth, regardless of the physical or philosophical validity of its foundation.

Continue reading

A hard look at the mind-warping culture of college sports

By DAVID MURPHY

dave@rebelbutter.com

There is an image that all of us need to internalize, particularly those of us who gathered in front of that famous little house in State College yesterday afternoon, whooping and chanting in a desperate attempt to keep a legend alive.

The image is one of a 10-year-old boy with his 10-year-old hands pressed up against the wall of a shower, a man he once trusted violating him from behind.

Pretend it was you. A 10-year-old you. And pretend that in the middle of this act, this violation of trust that you were not old enough to process, you heard a noise in the room behind you, and you turned your head to look, and you saw another person, another adult, one who clearly had the misfortune of stumbling upon the scene.

The adult saw you. The adult saw what the man in the shower was doing to you. The adult saw that you saw him, saw that the man saw him.

And then. . .there was silence. The adult left.

Maybe you recognized his face. Maybe you knew that he was a former Penn State quarterback, knew that he had transitioned into a coaching role. Maybe you were too confused, to panicked, too afraid to recognize anything. But you knew that somebody knew. You knew that an adult knew.

Out of all of the gut-wrenching images produced by the grand jury indictment against Jerry Sandusky, this is the one that should haunt all of us the most. Most sexual crimes play out in the dark, shrouded in secrecy and shame, their ultimate revelation accompanied by regretful declarations that if only we had known, things could have turned out differently.

And yet there it is, at the top of page seven, under the heading Victim 2: “The graduate assistant was shocked, but noticed that both Victim 2 and Sandusky saw him.”

This is the image that all of us need to remember, and the disturbing displays of defiance that unfolded in University Park yesterday suggest it is an image that has not yet registered with a segment of the school’s population.

They chanted Joe Paterno’s name, sang the alma mater, adhered to the old coach’s request to pray for the victims. Then they made plans to stand guard at his statue, determined to keep any vandals at bay.

It was and is everything that is wrong with the wind-warped populous that has been created by the propagandists who every day walk to their lairs dressed in president’s clothing. This is the culture that the multi-billion dollar facade known as revenue sports has created on college campuses across our country, a culture where our society’s supposed future is unable to distinguish between a football program and one of the most serious violations of trust ever committed by an institution of higher learning. This is not about Joe Paterno. This is not about whether we “Remember hm for 409,” as one sign-bearing student reportedly instructed us to do. This isn’t about Jerry Sandusky. This isn’t even about Penn State. If everything that we read in that grand jury report is true, this is about the kind of moral failure that a corrupt system of profiteering and control can breed when it starts to see itself as some sort of parallel society with its own set of rules and standards.

For six years, Victim 2 waited in silence for somebody to say something. For six years, he heard nothing. Nothing about the man he once trusted. Nothing about the crime he committed that day. Nothing that suggested anybody believed anything out of the ordinary occurred in the locker room that day.

For six years, nobody stood guard as Victim 2 suffered in silence. For six years, nobody provided an answer that had to gnaw his insides: Why? Why did it take six years? Why did it take a grand jury to determine the details of a sickening crime that a bystander had witnessed?

Maybe the answer unfolded before our eyes in front of that famous house yesterday afternoon. Here’s the thing about legends: nine times out of ten, they are complete bullshit. They are fairy tails invented for profit or comfort, designed to prey on our desperate belief that not all of us have to be human. Isn’t that what college sports are all about? The legends? They myths? The larger than life? Well guess what. Maybe, just maybe, most of it is bullshit.

Continue reading